.png){kind=spacer}
International law and globalist institutions, like the WHO, are undermining countries’ right to self-determination. The WHO claims it is led by Member States, but in reality, it is run by the unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats of the Secretariat.
We seek to protect national sovereignty from the globalist health agenda. Policies should be decided by independent nation-states, not globalist bodies that are building an empire and encroaching on domestic decisions.
Like every unaccountable globalist institution, the WHO is very good at wasting taxpayers’ money. It cost taxpayers over US$ 7billion in 2024-25 with the EU, US, Germany and the UK paying the most. That has to stop.
Find out how much your country contributes here.
Wealthy billionaires, foundations, and large corporations should not be funding the WHO, yet its largest funder is Bill Gates through the Gates Foundation, its second largest is the vaccine alliance GAVI, it takes donations from the Clinton Health Access Initiative and the Bloomberg Family Foundation, and it also receives 10s of millions of dollars from pharmaceutical companies.
The WHO produces the “Essential Medicines List” – a list of prioritized medicines which it claims represents the most effective, safe, and cost-effective treatments for public health needs, but that list contains medicines that are manufactured by the very same pharmaceutical companies who are giving them money.
Where there’s money, there’s influence – especially as funders get to decide what the WHO spends their money on – and through the NGOs that many of them fund, they get to influence the policies and direction of the WHO.
This has to end! The WHO, and the body which replaces it, should only be funded by member states, and therefore led by member states.
The WHO's mishandling of COVID-19, the 2014-16 Ebola outbreak in West Africa, and the 2003 SARS outbreak in Far East Asia, prove that the WHO cannot be trusted to contain the next pandemic.
Yet, the Pandemic Agreement agreed at the 78th World Health Assembly in June 2025, and the amendments to International Health Regulations (IHR) agreed at the 77th World Health Assembly in June 2024, have handed over unprecedented powers from countries to the WHO. They empower the WHO to dictate national public health policies and restrict fundamental freedoms in a future pandemic.
The WHO should not be dictating terms to countries and their citizens, so we call upon national governments to repeal both the IHR amendments and the Pandemic Agreement.
The WHO should stick to being a health agency, and not stray into other areas that do not concern it. In recent years it has behaved like a Left-wing campaign group; calling for an end to “environmental racism” as part of the Climate Change agenda, demanding that host countries provide the same levels of healthcare for both legal and illegal immigrants as their native populations, insisting that countries teach "gender identity" in schools from a young age, calling for more taxation on hard-pressed citizens without any representation, while also stating that sex education should be taught to children under the age of four years old.
In our view, the WHO, and its replacement, should remain neutral on culturally and politically sensitive issues.
Bodily autonomy, individual freedom, and personal responsibility are principles that no organization should undermine.
Adults should be treated like adults, instead of the WHO bullying countries into treating its citizens like children through excessive restrictions and mandates on pandemic preparedness, food, alcohol, soft drinks, medical treatments, and smoking cessation products.
Public health decisions and policies should be made by nation states, who should protect the rights of free citizens, and be accountable to The People who elect their governments.
.png)
China pays very little money into the WHO but wields a huge amount of influence by providing significant human resource to the agency and ensuring that its pick for Director-General is successfully chosen each term.
It treats the WHO like a geopolitical tool, instead of engaging with it as an international agency.
The WHO won't curtail the influence of the CCP and so its replacement should encourage a more westernised approach to international health which promotes accountability, transparency and freedom, instead of allowing authoritarianism to seep into global public health.